| Author |
Message |
twistar
Posts: 14
Phone Model:
Nokia 7210
Service Provider:
Eurotel |
 
Tue Jun 10, 2003 4:24 am |
|
to kuzuryusen: i dont understand it either. why should I buy cell phone with the same functions for 60 dollars more. is it only for design - which is, i must confess, marvelous. at last ive bought 7210 and iam calm.
|
 |
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
|
HeavyK
Posts: 11
Phone Model:
6100 |
Tue Jun 10, 2003 10:52 am |
| Quote: | My 6100 squeaks and the keys are firm...but it is the slimmest, lightest Nokia and that suits me best. I have no regrets.
The lack of radio is not an issue since I drive everywhere and can listen to whatever radio station or CD i choose - all in much better quality.
If you can't justify the extra cash, get a 6610. I don't think you will be disappointed, it's a great phone. |
I hear ya! 
Radio/no radio
Design - What do you like!?
It's that simple! 
|
|
junkie01
Posts: 2
Phone Model:
6610
Service Provider:
Proximus |
Tue Jun 10, 2003 4:16 pm |
|
the battery of the 6100 is worse....
|
|
SupaStar
Posts: 69
Phone Model:
Nokia 6100
Service Provider:
Optus |
Wed Jun 11, 2003 2:44 am |
|
If you think so. I don't
|
|
twistar
Posts: 14
Phone Model:
Nokia 7210
Service Provider:
Eurotel |
Wed Jun 11, 2003 5:38 am |
|
how can you say so, when the batteries are the same, i think
|
|
LowBatt
Posts: 35
Phone Model:
Nokia 5100
Service Provider:
Globe Telecoms |
Wed Jun 11, 2003 10:01 am |
Don't you just love nokia and how they market their products? they make you want to buy all of their phones and half of the consumers would want more than one nokia phone. Phones that are exactly the same inside but has a different shell. 
|
|
aneese
Posts: 1
Phone Model:
nokia 6100
Service Provider:
mtn sa |
Wed Jun 11, 2003 6:38 pm |
in my humble opinion, the 6100 is one of the greatest phones on the market. the 6610 seems to be a pretender to the throne. the incentive of a radio  is more than offset by the size and weight factor. 
the squeeking you heard about is even more prominent on the 6610 especially after changing x-press on covers a few times. and given the hideous range of standard covers on the 6610  you gona wanna change em believe me. 
On the plus side the display resolution matches that of the 6100 and you can still download the same java apps as th 6100. another positive is the battery life which i would think would be longer than a 6100 considering the radio usage factor.
either way its your choice
(viva 6100)
|
|
asu80
Posts: 86
Phone Model:
Nokia 6610
Service Provider:
tmtouch |
Fri Jun 20, 2003 1:35 pm |
|
in my opinon why 6100 is expensive because it has wallet and 6610 don't but has stereo radio
|
|
HeavyK
Posts: 11
Phone Model:
6100 |
Fri Jun 20, 2003 6:58 pm |
| Quote: | | in my opinon why 6100 is expensive because it has wallet and 6610 don't but has stereo radio |
In my opinion, the 6100 is an estetically beautiful phone contrary to the "square" design of the 6610 and that's worth paying for..... I don't know the price difference in "The US States", but here in Denmark, in US dollars, the Nokia 6100 is merely 34 dollars more expensive than 6610!
For the extra buck, you get a smaller and more smooth design at the cost of a crappy radio that drains the battery!
Second, the 6100 speakerphone feat. is far better than the one in 6610 and 7210!
And eventhough, if the 6100 had a radio, I wouldn't use it anyway, I always use my MP3 player...... my own great musik and very nice music quality!
|
|
jinkazama
Posts: 15
Phone Model:
Nokia 6610
Service Provider:
02 UK |
Fri Jul 11, 2003 3:37 pm |
In my view most of these posts are biased. 6610 user boast about the 6610. 6100 users boast about the 6100
so u should really ask someone who has experienced both
*cough*6610*cough*
|
