| Author |
Message |
ptc
Posts: 2 |
 
Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:53 pm |
|
Which of these two phone is better, and why?
|
 |
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
|
paperstreet
Posts: 344 |
Wed Oct 01, 2008 8:13 pm |
|
Chocolate 3. I recommend reading phonearena.com reviews for each of them. One has a 2MP camera (albeit not the best 2MP camera out there), great reception and sound quality, outside trackwheel is a decent add-on, and that's the LG. The Moto isn't that bad at all, just an update to the old RAZR, and is more reliable. The LG also has more memory card capacity. This is just my opinion about the devices, test one out and return it in the 30 day grace period if you like.
|
|
ptc
Posts: 2 |
Thu Oct 02, 2008 9:54 am |
Thanks for the info. I currently have the 755 that I got last week, which I like in some ways. Just wondering if I'm missing something better with the chocolate 3 I almost bought instead. The moto is bulky and heavy, for one thing, which I am not loving.
In what way is the Moto more reliable?
Drives me nuts, btw, that I can't either change the strength of the vibrate like i could on my old Razr, nor can I set the master volume to vibrate for calls, but 'ring' for VM or texts like I could with the razr. Why does technology/service always take 4 steps forward and 3 steps backwards?
|
|
paperstreet
Posts: 344 |
Thu Oct 02, 2008 8:24 pm |
|
The original RAZR came out many years ago and had issues on lots of them. This W755 is just more of a reliable device and won't exhibit a lot of those old defects, or at least there won't need to be as many replacements out there for it. I believe the LG would have that ring/vibe for text/calls option you wanted.
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
